Random Sample of NIH Chest X ray Dataset
Main product
Data Quantity
Optional product
Total Price
USD 0 VAT included
- Main productPremium
- Data QuantityBasic
- Optional productNot selected
- DownloadNo data
- All products are priced including VAT.
- Premium datasets are custom-made and take approximately two weeks from the date of application to improve quality.
- Common datasets can be checked on My Page after purchase.
Basic Price
USD 10,700 VAT included
A sample version of a large public medical imaging dataset containing 112,120 chest X-ray images and 15 disease (or normal) labels collected from 30,805 patients.
- Labeling type: Patient Gender
- Data Format: Tabular
Related Tags:
Categories:
About Dataset
1) Data Introduction
• The Random Sample of NIH Chest X-ray Dataset is a sample version of a large public medical imaging dataset containing 112,120 chest X-ray images and 15 disease (or normal) labels collected from 30,805 patients.2) Data Utilization
(1) Random Sample of NIH Chest X-ray Dataset has characteristics that: • Each sample comes with detailed metadata such as image file name, disease label, patient ID, age, gender, direction of shooting, and image size, and the label extracts the radiographic reading report with NLP, showing an accuracy of more than 90%. • It contains 5,606 1024x1024 size images, consisting of 14 diseases and a 'No Finding' class, but due to the nature of the sample, some disease data are very scarce. (2) Random Sample of NIH Chest X-ray Dataset can be used to: • Development of chest disease image reading AI: Using X-ray images with various chest disease labels, deep learning-based automatic diagnosis and classification models can be trained and evaluated. • Medical image data preprocessing and labeling research: It can be used for medical artificial intelligence research and algorithm development such as automatic labeling of large medical image datasets, data quality evaluation, and weak-supervised learning.Meta Data
Normal
Outstanding
Data Samples
Utility
| Downstream Classification (▲) | Entropy (▲) | MMD (▼) | 2D Correlation Similarity (▼) | One Class Classification (▼) | Duplication Rate (▼) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suitability | OK | OK | OK | OK | OK | OK |
The higher the value, the better (▲)
Model Performance
Downstream classification accuracy is an indicator used to evaluate the usefulness of synthetic data. It measures whether synthetic data performs similarly to real data. The method involves training the same model separately on real data and synthetic data, and then comparing the accuracies of the two models. Interpretation: A high accuracy rate means that the model trained on synthetic data performs similarly to the one trained on real data, indicating that the synthetic data is of high quality and well represents the real data.
The closer the value is to 0 or 1, or the lower the number, the better (▼)
Quality
MMD (Maximum Mean Discrepancy) is a metric used to assess the similarity between two probability distributions. It is commonly used to compare generated data with real data. High MMD score: A score above 0.05 indicates that the two distributions may differ. Low MMD score: Indicates that the generated data is similar to the real data. A score close to 0 is preferable, and a score below 0.01 suggests that the two data distributions are nearly indistinguishable.
Quality
2D Relationship Similarity measures the similarity in correlation structures between two datasets by comparing the correlation coefficients of columns in the original and generated data. High value (0.05 or above): Suggests differences in correlation structures, indicating the generated data may differ from the original. Low value: Indicates that the correlation structure of the generated data is similar to the original data. For instance, a 2D Relationship Similarity below 0.01 suggests the datasets are very similar.
Duplication Rate
Duplication Rate represents the proportion of identical or nearly identical items within a dataset. It is calculated by dividing the number of duplicate items by the total number of items. High Duplication Rate: Indicates lower data diversity and potential quality issues, which can reduce the reliability of analysis and models. Low Duplication Rate: Suggests higher data diversity and better quality.
Privacy
| Identification Risk (▼) | Linkage Risk (▼) | Inference Risk (▼) (Adjust by subtracting 0.5) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suitability | OK | OK | OK |
The closer to zero or the lower the value, the better (▼)
Structural Similarity
Identification risk assesses how well synthetic data protects the privacy of the original data. It measures the likelihood that synthetic data can match records from the original data, thereby evaluating the potential for identifying specific individuals. Interpretation: A value closer to 0 indicates that the synthetic data is effectively protecting personal information. The level of risk considered safe can vary depending on the nature and sensitivity of the information contained in the data.
Perceptual Similarity
Linkage risk assesses the risk of inferring sensitive information from the original data using synthetic data. It measures the proportion of quasi-identifier values in the synthetic data that match those in the original data when an attacker knows quasi-identifier information from the original data. High Duplication Rate: Indicates lower data diversity and potential quality issues, which can reduce the reliability of analysis and models. Interpretation: A lower risk indicates that the data is safer, meaning there is a reduced likelihood of inferring sensitive information.
Premium Report Information
Premium dataset sample
